2019 EEA Local Projects for Board
Instructions for Judging
Hello Board and thank you for taking the time to review the projects and cast your votes for "Best Local Project."
All the projects listed below were completed within the jurisdiction of ACEC/MW.
After you have reviewed the projects, please email Anna (staff@acecmw.org) with your TOP 3 picks. Please email by 11:59pm Thursday, November 7th.
All the projects listed below were completed within the jurisdiction of ACEC/MW.
After you have reviewed the projects, please email Anna (staff@acecmw.org) with your TOP 3 picks. Please email by 11:59pm Thursday, November 7th.
Criteria
1. Uniqueness and/or Innovative Application of New or Existing Techniques
- Does the entry demonstrate the use of a new science or a breakthrough in the general knowledge of engineering?
- Does the entry represent a unique application of new or existing technology, techniques, materials or equipment?
2. Future Value to the Engineering Profession and Perception by the Public
- Will the entry redefine current engineering thinking?
- Advance a positive public image of engineering excellence?
3. Social, Economic and Sustainable Development Considerations
- Do the solutions identified produce secondary benefits of value to the community environment?
- Does the entrant’s approach provide society with social, economic, or sustainable development benefits?
- Does the entrant’s contribution to the project improve the health, safety or welfare of the public or affected environment?
4. Complexity
- Did the entrant successfully address highly complex criteria or unique problems?
- Were extraordinary problems of site, location, hazardous conditions, project requirements, or similar elements present?
- Did the entry require the use of out-of-the-ordinary technology or ingenuity for achievement of the project’s goals?
5. Successful Fulfilment of Client/Owner Needs
- Did the engineer or entrant successfully engage the client/owner in the overall project development process?
- Was it an economical and cost-effective solution?
- How did the final cost relate to the original budget estimate?
- How closely does the entrant’s solution meet the total goals of the client/owner?
- Did the entrant meet the client’s time schedule?
Submissions
Firm: A+F Engineers
Project: Coolidge Senior High School - Renovations + Additions
Category: Design
Complete File
Firm: A. Morton Thomas
Project: The Fields at RFK Campus
Category: Design
Complete File
Firm: Arup
Project: The REACH at the Kennedy Center
Category: Design
Complete File
Firm: Clark/Parsons, A Joint Venture
Project: CSX Virginia Avenue Tunnel Reconstruction
Category: Design
Complete File
Firm: EBA Engineering, Inc.
Project: Edmonston Avenue Bridge Renovation
Category: Design
Complete File
Firm: HNTB
Project: Transform I-66 Inside the Beltway
Category: Non-Design and Design
Complete File
Firm: M.C. Dean
Project: National Museum of the United States Army
Category: Design
Complete File
Firm: Michael Baker International
Project: Customer and Data Services
Category: Non-Design
Complete File
Firm: Parsons
Project: Reconstruction of Monroe Street Bridge, NE over Railroad
Category: Design
Complete File
Firm: Sabra & Associates, Inc.
Project: Rapid Deployment of Vision Zero Engineering Measures
Category: Design
Complete File
Firm: Silman
Project: Wilson Secondary School
Category: Design
Complete File
Firm: Stantec
Project: Second Avenue Cycle Track
Category: Design
Complete File
Firm: WSP
Project: EB Wilson Blvd. over Rte. 50 (Seven Corners), Falls Church, VA
Category: Design
Complete File